To list on an SME exchange in India, your company must satisfy criteria set under the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018. The two main SME platforms are NSE Emerge and BSE SME.

Core SEBI ICDR Eligibility Criteria for SME IPO

1. Post-Issue Paid-Up Capital

After the IPO, the total paid-up capital must not exceed ₹25 crore. If it exceeds ₹25 crore, the company must list on the Main Board instead. This is the single most important size threshold.

2. Net Worth

The company must have a positive net worth for at least 2 out of 3 preceding financial years. Net worth is typically calculated as paid-up share capital plus free reserves minus accumulated losses and deferred expenditure.

3. Profitability Track Record

A net profit from operations for at least 2 of the last 3 financial years is required. Loss-making companies generally cannot proceed with an SME IPO without restructuring.

4. Operating History

The company must have been in existence for at least 3 years in the same line of business. For recently incorporated companies, this requirement can sometimes be met through a predecessor entity — but this requires careful legal structuring.

5. Company Structure

Only Public Limited Companies can list. If your company is a Private Limited company, LLP, OPC, or partnership, it must first convert to a Public Limited company — a process that takes 3–6 months and requires ROC filings, EGM approvals, and MCA notifications.

6. Issue Size

SME IPO issue size is typically between ₹2 crore and ₹100 crore. Issues below ₹2 crore are generally not viable given advisory costs. Issues above ₹100 crore are better suited to the Main Board.

Exchange-Specific Requirements

NSE Emerge

BSE SME

Common Reasons SME IPOs Get Rejected by SEBI

Based on typical SEBI observations on DRHP filings, the most common issues are:

  1. Related party transactions (RPTs) — undisclosed loans to directors, promoter family, or group companies
  2. Pending litigation — especially tax demands, labour court cases, or criminal proceedings against promoters
  3. Revenue recognition issues — inconsistent accounting treatment of revenue across years
  4. Promoter shareholding mismatches — cap table discrepancies vs. ROC records
  5. Incomplete statutory audit trail — missing CARO observations addressed, unqualified audit reports required